4 ways the past 5 years vindicate the Liberal Democrats

The five years since the last general election have been brutal for the Liberal Democrat’s popularity. But in key areas they have proved the party right.

1. Coalitions can work

Our first peace time coalition in decades survived for a full term. It retained a working majority and had little trouble delivering its legislative agenda. Ministers from different parties worked together more constructively than Blairites and Brownites from the same party did.

Even accepting those points, you may still disapprove of what the Coalition has done. But in that it’s worth asking, whether your objection to the government arises from the fact it was a coalition or rather the fact it was mostly composed of Conservative MPs?

I’d suggest that this past parliament is a clear demonstration that coalition is a viable form of government.

2. First-past-the-post sucks!!!

Voters may have decisively rejected changing the electoral system but that just demonstrates their fallibility.

The advantage of our current electoral system is supposed to be that it delivers strong, stable governments with clear majorities. If you are still expecting one of those come May 8th, then may I ask: would you be interested in buying these tickets to Danny Alexander’s reelection party?

The mood of voters is such that they are no longer going to be corralled into a binary Labour/Conservative choice by the electoral system. Trying to make them do so will, however, produce perverse results. Like how the SNP will probably wind up with fewer votes than any of UKIP, the Lib Dems or Greens but more seats than them all combined.

The Lib Dems have been warning you about this for a very long time indeed.

3. We can wield power

There used to be people who scoffed that we were a party for people who didn’t take politics seriously and were doomed to perpetual irrelevance in opposition. They proved to be wrong on both counts.

Not only did we enter government in 2010 – and may yet reenter it in 2015 – but it turned out we knew how to behave when we got there.

Our ministers were on average at least as component as their Conservative counterparts. The not normally Lib Dem friendly Telegraph called Steve Webb, ‘the best minister in the coalition‘ and suggested he stay on in his job whoever forms the next government.

And our backbenchers have proved decidedly more disciplined than their surprisingly rebellious and at times positively petulant Tory backbenches.

Which has all been the means by which we achieved these ends:

image

4. The middle ground needs filling again

Back in 2006, Polly Toynbee wrote a piece for the Guardian comparing the SDP with the Liberal Democrats. She pronounced that:
“The vast space between the extremes of Foot and Thatcher left a great need for a new progressive party…[but]…Where once there was a great savannah of available political space, now the air is too thin to breathe between New Labour and Cameron Tories.”

Boy has that changed. Both parties have turned away from each other to try and shore up their core votes. The differences between their economic plans are now vast. And the siren call of UKIP and the SNP is likely to draw them towards even further apart.

Without the Lib Dems to provide a balancing force in the middle then we are likely to see the return of what Roy Jenkins called the ‘ideological big dipper‘. His worry was that if governments with sharply differentiated platforms alternated in power then there would be constant upheavals as they reversed each others programmes. Jenkins thought we needed a third party to balance the other two and thereby provide some continuity. With some adjustments that’s a role that still needs filling.

———————————————

Of course, I’m not bringing this up now (just) to say ‘we told you so’. Rather, I am making a point about the elections on Thursday. We are in a state of constitutional and electoral flux. It is going to be a challenging time for our political system. And it is more likely to respond constructively if it has input from a party that has understood these issues and has the right instincts for dealing with them.

Advertisements

One thought on “4 ways the past 5 years vindicate the Liberal Democrats

  1. The advantage of our current electoral system is supposed to be that it delivers strong, stable governments with clear majorities. If you are still expecting one of those come May 8th, then may I ask: would you be interested in buying these tickets to Danny Alexander’s reelection party?

    I keep reading this but it seems to be completely wrong-headed.

    Assume for a moment that you think the point of an election is to choose a government (I know that some Lib Dems don’t, they hunger for a European-style politics where the point of an election is to populate a legislature with a bunch of parties none of which have a majority so they can start playing out the kind of Borgen-style coalition horse-trading that they love; but most British people do not think of elections like that).

    It is true that first-past-the-post is currently failing to do that.

    However, there have been period sin the past when first-past-the-post has failed to do that as well, notably the twenties and thirties when Labour was taking over from the Liberals as the ‘other party’. And that sorted itself out and we got back to a situation where we had elections choosing governments again.

    So it is entirely possible that this current situation, where first-past-the-post is not producing clear governments, is just a ‘wobble’ and that in a decade or two it will sort itself out and we’ll have strong single-party governments again (they may or may not be the same two parties, of course).

    On the other hand, a system like STV is almost guaranteed to never produce a stable single-party government.

    So, assuming you think that elections are to pick governments, why would you swap a system which isn’t currently doing that but might settle back down to doing so sometime in the future, for one which guarantees that Britain will never again have a proper government, and will instead have to become a European-style coalition-based consensual-politics kind of a place (which Lib Dems, but nobody else, would love)?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s